
Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU): it remains the more sensible modern option while UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β1128.6% higher power demand at 86W vs 7W.
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 7W instead of 86W, a 79W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5750
2009UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU): it remains the more sensible modern option while UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Draws 7W instead of 86W, a 79W reduction.
- β More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019β2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β1128.6% higher power demand at 86W vs 7W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) better than Radeon HD 5750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 5750 make more sense than UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 10 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5750 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,169 | 1,200+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 720+1025% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 5750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | β | QuickSync |
| Decoder | β | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W β a 169.9% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 86W | 7W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | β | 0mm |
| Height | β | 0mm |
| Slots | β | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | β | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.6 | 171.4+1160% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130 MSRP, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) β the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5750 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | Lakefield GT2 |
| Release | October 13 2009 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #834 | #893 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













