Radeon HD 5750
VS
Quadro K620M

Radeon HD 5750 vs Quadro K620M

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

2009Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K620M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 5750 is positioned at rank 143 and the Quadro K620M is on rank 101, so the Quadro K620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
807%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
775%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
766%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
765%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
763%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
759%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
749%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
747%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
740%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
738%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
729%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
727%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
714%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
714%
#87
Radeon RX 7500
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
91%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
90%
#128
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
890%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
100%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
97%
#146
Radeon HD 8670D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
96%
#147
Radeon R7 A370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $51
96%
#148
Radeon HD 5770
MSRP: $159|Avg: $159
94%
#149
Radeon HD 4770
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
93%
#150
Radeon HD 8510G
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
92%
#151
Radeon HD 8550G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#153
GeForce GT 635
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#154
Radeon R7 A8-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
#156
Radeon HD 5670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
90%
#157
GeForce GT 740A
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
89%
#158
Radeon HD 7420G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620M

#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
100%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
99%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
97%
#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
94%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
92%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
88%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
87%
#86
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1020%
#101
Quadro K620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#105
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#111
Quadro P520
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#113
Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro K620M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Quadro K620M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K620M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 5750Quadro K620M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 5750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5750 and Quadro K620M

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K620M

The Quadro K620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,159 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5750 scores 1,169 and the Quadro K620M reaches 1,159 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5750 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro K620M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 720 (Radeon HD 5750) vs 384 (Quadro K620M). Raw compute: 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620M).

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Quadro K620M
G3D Mark Score
1,169
1,159
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
720+88%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.008 TFLOPS+17%
0.8632 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
36+125%
16
L1 Cache
72 KB
128 KB+78%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Quadro K620M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620M has 4 GB. The Quadro K620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 5750) vs 1 MB (Quadro K620M) — the Quadro K620M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Quadro K620M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5750 draws 86W versus the Quadro K620M's 30W — a 96.6% difference. The Quadro K620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5750) vs 350W (Quadro K620M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Quadro K620M
TDP
86W
30W-65%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
13.6
38.6+184%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K620M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 5750Quadro K620M
MSRP
$130
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Codename
Juniper
GM108
Release
October 13 2009
March 1 2015
Ranking
#834
#842