CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 5830
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon HD 5830 is significantly newer (2010 vs 0). The Radeon HD 5830 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5830 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5830 and Iris Plus Graphics 950
Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5830 scores 1,726 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5830 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726 | 1,789+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1120+119% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+75% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5830 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 5830 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs Quick Sync 7.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5830 draws 175W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 168.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5830) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 280mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 119.3+1105% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 57.5 (Radeon HD 5830) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $239 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Cypress | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | February 25 2010 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #724 | #634 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 5830 and Iris Plus Graphics 950
