Radeon HD 5830
VS
Radeon HD 6900M

Radeon HD 5830 vs Radeon HD 6900M

AMD

Radeon HD 5830

2010Core: 800 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6900M

2011Core: 680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6900M

#337
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
954%
#339
865%
#340
863%
#344
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
784%
#345
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
779%
#347
Radeon HD 6900M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
98%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
98%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
96%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
93%
#361
93%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5830 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6900M.

InsightRadeon HD 5830Radeon HD 6900M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (280mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 5830 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5830 and Radeon HD 6900M

AMD

Radeon HD 5830

The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6900M

The Radeon HD 6900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,707 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5830 scores 1,726 and the Radeon HD 6900M reaches 1,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5830 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6900M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6900M). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6900M).

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon HD 6900M
G3D Mark Score
1,726+1%
1,707
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1120+17%
960
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.792 TFLOPS+37%
1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
56+17%
48
L1 Cache
112 KB
192 KB+71%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon HD 6900M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5830 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6900M has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 5830 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon HD 6900M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5830 draws 175W versus the Radeon HD 6900M's 75W — a 80% difference. The Radeon HD 6900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5830) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6900M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon HD 6900M
TDP
175W
75W-57%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
280mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
9.9
22.8+130%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 6900M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon HD 6900M
MSRP
$239
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
Cypress
Blackcomb
Release
February 25 2010
January 4 2011
Ranking
#724
#654