Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon HD 5830

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon HD 5830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon HD 5830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 175W, a 160W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 280mm, a 279mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 5830

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 5830 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
139% HIGHER MSRP
$239 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌1066.7% higher power demand at 175W vs 15W.
❌27900% longer card at 280mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Plus Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 5830 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $139 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $239, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.7% (17.9 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 5830 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon HD 5830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Radeon HD 5830

The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
G3D Mark Score	1,789+4%	1,726
Architecture	Generation 11.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	10 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512	1120+119%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS	1.792 TFLOPS+75%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 5830 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics and 256-bit on the Radeon HD 5830.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	128 GB/s
Bus Width	System	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
DirectX	12_1+7%	11.2
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 2.2.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
Encoder	QuickSync	UVD 2.2
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 2.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 168.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
TDP	15W-91%	175W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	280mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	119.3+1105%	9.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 58.2% cheaper ($139 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 148.6% better value.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon HD 5830
MSRP	$100-58%	$239
Performance per Dollar	17.9+149%	7.2
Codename	Ice Lake GT2	Cypress
Release	sem dados	February 25 2010
Ranking	#714	#724

Search Iris Plus Graphics on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5830 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.