GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is significantly newer (2012 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 560 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $150 for the GeForce GTX 560 SE, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 263.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+263.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Plus Graphics
GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,847+3% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 512+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+21% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 SE comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | QuickSync |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 210mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 119.3+870% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 263.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $40-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3 | 44.7+263% |
| Codename | GF114 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | February 20 2012 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #706 | #714 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Plus Graphics
