Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012Core: 736 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 560 SE
1 GB 150
1,847
+3.2%
brand logoGeForce 930M
brand logoGeForce GT 745A
brand logoGeForce GT 740
brand logoGeForce GTX 555
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoTITAN V
Iris Plus Graphics
Shared System RAM 15
1,789
0.0%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 560 SE is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    50% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
  • ❌20900% longer card at 210mm vs 1mm.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 45.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 210mm, a 209mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (1,847 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 560 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2012 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 45.3% (17.9 vs 12.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,847+3%
1,789
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Generation 11.0
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
288
512+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8479 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
48+50%
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 560 SE gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 SE and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
DirectX
12_0
12_1
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs QuickSync.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
QuickSync
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 210mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
TDP
150W
15W-90%
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
210mm
1mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Perf/Watt
12.3
119.3+870%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 SE came in at $150, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 45.5% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics
MSRP
$150
$100-33%
Performance per Dollar
12.3
17.9+46%
Codename
GF114
Ice Lake GT2
Release
February 20 2012
sem dados
Ranking
#706
#714
Search GeForce GTX 560 SE on AmazonSearch Iris Plus Graphics on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.