Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Iris Plus Graphics

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

  • Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (1,848 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Iris Plus Graphics is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics P630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $100 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.3% (18.5 vs 17.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Iris Plus Graphics has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,848+3%
1,789
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Generation 11.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
10 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4608 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+122%
Boost Clock
1200 MHz+20%
1000 MHz
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics P630 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs QuickSync.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
Encoder
Quick Sync (Coffee Lake)
QuickSync
Decoder
Gen 9.5
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
123.2+3%
119.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics P630 came in at $100, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.5 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 3.4% better value.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Iris Plus Graphics
MSRP
$100
$100
Performance per Dollar
18.5+3%
17.9
Codename
Coffee Lake GT2
Ice Lake GT2
Release
May 24 2018
sem dados
Ranking
#640
#714

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.