
FirePro M5100
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro M5100
2013Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics P630: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics P630
2018Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro M5100
2013Intel UHD Graphics P630
2018Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Intel UHD Graphics P630: it remains the more sensible modern option while Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro M5100 better than Intel UHD Graphics P630?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel UHD Graphics P630 make more sense than FirePro M5100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 5 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M5100 and Intel UHD Graphics P630

FirePro M5100
FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

Intel UHD Graphics P630
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874+1% | 1,848 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 640+233% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS+115% | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1200 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M5100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The FirePro M5100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | Gen 9.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W β a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75Β°C vs 80Β°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | β |
| Height | 70mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C-6% | 80Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5 | 123.2+886% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M5100 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100. The FirePro M5100 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M5100) vs 18.5 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) β the FirePro M5100 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 18.5 |
| Codename | Venus | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | May 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #701 | #640 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












