
Intel UHD Graphics P630

Radeon Pro WX 2100
Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel UHD Graphics P630
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌49% HIGHER MSRP$149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 18.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.

Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1219 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,848 | 1,871+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 512+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 1.248 TFLOPS+171% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1219 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 2100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics P630 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | Gen 9.5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 80% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-57% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 123.2+130% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics P630 came in at $100, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics P630 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.5 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 46.8% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics P630 (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.5+47% | 12.6 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Lexa |
| Release | May 24 2018 | June 4 2017 |
| Ranking | #640 | #702 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















