Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 47.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 49% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 18.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,871 vs 1,848), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics P630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47.2% (18.5 vs 12.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 2100 has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score
1,848
1,871+1%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
14 nm
Shading Units
192
512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4608 TFLOPS
1.248 TFLOPS+171%
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1219 MHz+2%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 2100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics P630 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
Encoder
Quick Sync (Coffee Lake)
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder
Gen 9.5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 80% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP
15W-57%
35W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
123.2+130%
53.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics P630 came in at $100, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics P630 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.5 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 46.8% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics P630 (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics P630Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP
$100-33%
$149
Performance per Dollar
18.5+47%
12.6
Codename
Coffee Lake GT2
Lexa
Release
May 24 2018
June 4 2017
Ranking
#640
#702

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.