Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon R9 M360
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is positioned at rank 263 and the Radeon R9 M360 is on rank 443, so the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M360 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M360 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $81 for the Radeon R9 M360, it costs 38% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 64.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and Radeon R9 M360
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,848+2% | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 512+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 0.9472 TFLOPS+106% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+30% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M360 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Gen 9.5 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 123.2+407% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 and now averages $81. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 costs 38.3% less ($31 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 64.4% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-38% | $81 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0+64% | 22.5 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Tropo |
| Release | May 24 2018 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #640 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics P630 and Radeon R9 M360
