GeForce MX230 vs Iris Plus Graphics

NVIDIA

GeForce MX230

2019Core: 1519 MHzBoost: 1582 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce MX230 vs Iris Plus Graphics Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX230 vs Iris Plus Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.2 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 47% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 12.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX230 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (1,826 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2019 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47% (17.9 vs 12.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce MX230 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX230 vs Iris Plus Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX230Iris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,826+2%
1,789
Architecture
Pascal
Generation 11.0
Process Node
14 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
256
512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.81 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock
1582 MHz+58%
1000 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
16
32+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce MX230Iris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX230 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce MX230 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX230 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics.

FeatureGeForce MX230Iris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce MX230Iris Plus Graphics
TDP
10W-33%
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
182.6+53%
119.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX230 came in at $150, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 46.7% better value.

FeatureGeForce MX230Iris Plus Graphics
MSRP
$150
$100-33%
Performance per Dollar
12.2
17.9+47%
Codename
GP108
Ice Lake GT2
Release
February 21 2019
sem dados
Ranking
#708
#714

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.