CPU
GPU
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Radeon R6 M340DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R6 M340DX is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The Radeon R6 M340DX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R6 M340DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R6 M340DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $40 for the Iris Plus Graphics, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 302.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+302.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics and Radeon R6 M340DX
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Radeon R6 M340DX
The Radeon R6 M340DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 955 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the Radeon R6 M340DX reaches 1,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon R6 M340DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 384 (Radeon R6 M340DX). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 0.791 TFLOPS (Radeon R6 M340DX). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 1,800 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+29% | 0.791 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1030 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R6 M340DX has 512 MB. The Radeon R6 M340DX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12_0 (Radeon R6 M340DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Radeon R6 M340DX's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 350W (Radeon R6 M340DX). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+99% | 60.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R6 M340DX launched at $0 and now averages $10. The Radeon R6 M340DX costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 180.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX) — the Radeon R6 M340DX offers 302.7% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R6 M340DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $10-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.7 | 180.0+303% |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Jet |
| Release | sem dados | December 12 2015 |
| Ranking | #714 | #852 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics and Radeon R6 M340DX
