Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R9 M360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R9 M360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 195.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M360

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M360 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M360 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,819 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M360 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Plus Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 195.1% (17.9 vs 6.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 M360 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Radeon R9 M360

The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
G3D Mark Score	1,789	1,819+2%
Architecture	Generation 11.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+8%	0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz+8%	925 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	32	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 carries 512 MB. Radeon R9 M360 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
Encoder	QuickSync	VCE 1.0
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 3.1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	119.3+391%	24.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 193.4% better value.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	Radeon R9 M360
MSRP	$100-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	17.9+193%	6.1
Codename	Ice Lake GT2	Tropo
Release	sem dados	May 5 2015
Ranking	#714	#711

Search Iris Plus Graphics on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.