
Iris Plus Graphics

Radeon R7 M465X
Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R7 M465X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R7 M465X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.9 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 M465X
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M465X is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 17.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Radeon R7 M465X
The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 1,787 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+8% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+8% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M465X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+8% | 11.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE (Early) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+401% | 23.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.9 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 11.9 (Radeon R7 M465X) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 50.4% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon R7 M465X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.9+50% | 11.9 |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Tropo |
| Release | sem dados | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #714 | #715 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















