
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Radeon HD 5830
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon HD 5830 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon HD 5830 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon HD 5830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 175W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5830
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 5830 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1066.7% higher power demand at 175W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon HD 5830 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789+4% | 1,726 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1120+119% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+75% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 5830 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950 and 256-bit on the Radeon HD 5830.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 7 | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 7 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 168.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 280mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+1105% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 950 was 100+% cheaper ($239 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon HD 5830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $239 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 7.2 |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Cypress |
| Release | sem dados | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #634 | #724 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















