
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Radeon R9 M360
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R9 M360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R9 M360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M360 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 1,819+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+8% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+8% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 carries 512 MB. Radeon R9 M360 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 7 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 7 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+391% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 950 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 6.1 |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Tropo |
| Release | sem dados | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #634 | #711 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















