GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012Core: 736 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 560 SE is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 560 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (1,847 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 560 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2012 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score
1,847+3%
1,789
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Generation 11.0
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
288
512+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8479 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
48+50%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 560 SE gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 SE and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_1)
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs Quick Sync 7.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
Quick Sync 7
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
Quick Sync 7
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
TDP
150W
15W-90%
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
210mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.3
119.3+870%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 SE came in at $150, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 950 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 SEIris Plus Graphics 950
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
12.3
Infinity
Codename
GF114
Ice Lake GT2
Release
February 20 2012
sem dados
Ranking
#706
#634

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.