
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 950 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor

Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor reaches 1,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor uses GCN 5.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1251 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789+1% | 1,769 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 704+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+72% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1251 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 44+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 7 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 7 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor's 35W — a 80% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-57% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+136% | 50.5 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Raven |
| Release | sem dados | May 10 2018 |
| Ranking | #634 | #673 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















