Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is positioned at rank #263 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 950.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics P630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and Iris Plus Graphics 950
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,848+3% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 512+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+122% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+20% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | Gen 9.5 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 123.2+3% | 119.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 24 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #640 | #634 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics P630 and Iris Plus Graphics 950
