Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R7 M465X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R7 M465X Performance Spectrum

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Shared System RAM 15
1,789
+0.1%
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
Radeon R7 M465X
0.5 GB 75
1,787
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
brand logoRadeon HD 7750M
brand logoRadeon HD 4870
brand logoRadeon Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R7 M465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M465X

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M465X is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,789 vs 1,787), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M465X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M465X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Plus Graphics 950 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon R7 M465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the Radeon R7 M465X reaches 1,787 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon R7 M465X uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M465X). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
G3D Mark Score
1,789
1,787
Architecture
Generation 11.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+8%
0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz+8%
925 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
32
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465X carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M465X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465X.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
DirectX
12 (12_1)+8%
11.1
Vulkan
1.3+30%
1.0
OpenGL
4.6+7%
4.3
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
Encoder
Quick Sync 7
VCE (Early)
Decoder
Quick Sync 7
UVD
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 M465X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
119.3+401%
23.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 950 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 11.9 (Radeon R7 M465X) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 950Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP
$0-100%
$150
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
11.9
Codename
Ice Lake GT2
Tropo
Release
sem dados
May 15 2016
Ranking
#634
#715
Search Iris Plus Graphics 950 on AmazonSearch Radeon R7 M465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.