
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.


Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U
The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,778 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U reaches 1,778 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U uses Vega, both on 10 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 1,778 |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2100 MHz+110% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 7 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 7 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 78.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 78-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3 | 118.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U) — the Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Vega |
| Release | sem dados | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #634 | #545 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















