GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 5830

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 650

2012Core: 1058 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 5830

2010Core: 800 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 5830 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 650

2 GB 65

1,756

+1.7%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

1,726

0.0%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 5830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 5830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 650

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
✅Delivers 123.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 280mm, a 135mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5830 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 5830

2010

Why buy it

✅95.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
119.3% HIGHER MSRP
$239 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 16.1 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 5830 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 95.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 650 instead at 1,756 vs 1,726, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $239, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 123.1% (16.1 vs 7.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 5830 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 5830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 650

The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon HD 5830

The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 scores 1,756 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
G3D Mark Score	1,756+2%	1,726
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1120+192%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8125 TFLOPS	1.792 TFLOPS+121%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	112 KB+250%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5830 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 650 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 650) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon HD 5830) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon HD 5830. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 and 256-bit on the Radeon HD 5830. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTX 650) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	128 GB/s+60%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
DirectX	11_0	11.2+2%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 650) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 2.2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	UVD 2.2
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 91.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 650) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
TDP	65W-63%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
Length	145mm	280mm
Slots	2	2
Perf/Watt	27.0+173%	9.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 650 came in at $109, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 was 54.4% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.1 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) — the GeForce GTX 650 offers 123.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 650 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 650	Radeon HD 5830
MSRP	$109-54%	$239
Performance per Dollar	16.1+124%	7.2
Codename	GK107	Cypress
Release	September 6 2012	February 25 2010
Ranking	#719	#724

Search GeForce GTX 650 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5830 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.