GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650

2012Core: 1058 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

2013Core: 657 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce GTX 760M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce GTX 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce GTX 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 650

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

GeForce GTX 760M

2013

Why buy it

  • 57.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 650 instead at 1,756 vs 1,726, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 760M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce GTX 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650

The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 650 scores 1,756 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650GeForce GTX 760M
G3D Mark Score
1,756+2%
1,726
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8125 TFLOPS
1.009 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
32 KB
64 KB+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 650GeForce GTX 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760M.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650GeForce GTX 760M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 650 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 16.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 650GeForce GTX 760M
TDP
65W
55W-15%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
27.0
31.4+16%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760M (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 650GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP
$109
Codename
GK107
GK106
Release
September 6 2012
May 30 2013
Ranking
#719
#725

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.