Radeon HD 5830 vs Radeon R9 M375X

AMD

Radeon HD 5830

2010Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1015 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 5830 vs Radeon R9 M375X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 5830 vs Radeon R9 M375X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 5830 vs Radeon R9 M375X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 5830

2010

Why buy it

  • 60.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M375X

2015

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 175W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5830 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 4.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$239 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 5830 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,726 vs 1,711), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 5830 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5830 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $239 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5.5% (7.2 vs 6.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 5830 vs Radeon R9 M375X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 5830

The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M375X

The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5830 scores 1,726 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5830 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X).

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon R9 M375X
G3D Mark Score
1,726
1,711
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1120+75%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.792 TFLOPS+38%
1.299 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
112 KB
160 KB+43%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon R9 M375X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5830 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M375X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon HD 5830) vs 80 GB/s (Radeon R9 M375X) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon HD 5830. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon HD 5830 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M375X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375X) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon R9 M375X
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
4 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s+60%
80 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5830 draws 175W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 80% difference. The Radeon R9 M375X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5830) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon R9 M375X
TDP
175W
75W-57%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
280mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
9.9
22.8+130%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 5830 came in at $239, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5830 was 4.4% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 6.8 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the Radeon HD 5830 offers 5.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M375X (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 5830Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP
$239-4%
$250
Performance per Dollar
7.2+6%
6.8
Codename
Cypress
Tropo
Release
February 25 2010
May 5 2015
Ranking
#724
#727

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.