Radeon HD 5970
VS
GeForce GTX 460

Radeon HD 5970 vs GeForce GTX 460

AMD

Radeon HD 5970

2009Core: 725 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460

2010Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 5970 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (2 GB vs 768 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460.

InsightRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (305mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $100), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 296.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+296.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5970 and GeForce GTX 460

AMD

Radeon HD 5970

The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5970 scores 2,297 and the GeForce GTX 460 reaches 2,275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5970 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 460 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460). Raw compute: 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460).

FeatureRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
G3D Mark Score
2,297
2,275
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1600 ×2+376%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.32 TFLOPS ×2+156%
0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2
32
TMUs
80 ×2+43%
56
L1 Cache
320 KB
448 KB+40%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 5970 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB. The Radeon HD 5970 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+167%
0.75 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 460).

FeatureRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
Encoder
None
Decoder
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5970 draws 294W versus the GeForce GTX 460's 160W — a 59% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon HD 5970) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
TDP
294W
160W-46%
Recommended PSU
650W
450W-31%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
305mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
7.8
14.2+82%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 5970 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 460 launched at $199 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 460 costs 75% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 91.0 (GeForce GTX 460) — the GeForce GTX 460 offers 295.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 460 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 5970GeForce GTX 460
MSRP
$699
$199-72%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$25-75%
Performance per Dollar
23.0
91.0+296%
Codename
Hemlock
GF104
Release
November 18 2009
July 12 2010
Ranking
#651
#652