CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6290
Popular choices:
GeForce 8300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6290 is positioned at rank 313 and the GeForce 8300 is on rank 640, so the Radeon HD 6290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6290 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8300.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6290 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6290 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6290 and GeForce 8300
Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce 8300
The GeForce 8300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6290 scores 105 and the GeForce 8300 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6290 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce 8300 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 256 (GeForce 8300). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105+3% | 102 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+500% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+333% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96 ×2+500% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8300) — the GeForce 8300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8300). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+33% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8300).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6290 draws 375W versus the GeForce 8300's 33W — a 167.6% difference. The GeForce 8300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6290) vs 350W (GeForce 8300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 33W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 3.1+933% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 8300 launched at $50 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 2.0 (GeForce 8300) — the Radeon HD 6290 offers 5% better value. The GeForce 8300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 8300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Codename | Antilles | GM108 |
| Release | March 8 2011 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #583 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6290 and GeForce 8300
