CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6290
Popular choices:
Radeon X1950 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6290 is positioned at rank 313 and the Radeon X1950 GT is on rank 339, so the Radeon HD 6290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1950 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1950 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The Radeon X1950 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6290 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1950 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6290.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1950 GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $50 for the Radeon HD 6290, it costs 2% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6290 and Radeon X1950 GT
Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6290 scores 105 and the Radeon X1950 GT reaches 106 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6290 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105 | 106 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2 | 5120+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 | 23.8 TFLOPS+833% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 96 ×2 | 320+233% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+24% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs Avivo.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6290 draws 375W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 11.3% difference. The Radeon X1950 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6290) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 335W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 230mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140 and now averages $49. The Radeon X1950 GT costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 2.2 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT offers 4.8% better value. The Radeon X1950 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-64% | $140 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $49-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 2.2+5% |
| Codename | Antilles | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 8 2011 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #583 | #25 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6290 and Radeon X1950 GT
