GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 6290

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6290

2011Core: 830 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 6290 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 320M

2017

Why buy it

  • 45.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 375W, a 345W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6290

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 320M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1150% higher power demand at 375W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 320M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8.6% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 105), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6290 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 320M vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 320M

The GeForce GT 320M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 6290

The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 320M scores 114 versus the Radeon HD 6290's 105 — the GeForce GT 320M leads by 8.6%. The GeForce GT 320M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 320M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 320M) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
G3D Mark Score
114+9%
105
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 3
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1536 ×2+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
2.55 TFLOPS ×2+126%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
24
96 ×2+300%
L1 Cache
144 KB
384 KB+167%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 320M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6290 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 320M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 320M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 320M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_1) (GeForce GT 320M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
DirectX
11.1 (FL10_1)
11.2
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 320M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
Encoder
VP4
Decoder
VP4
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 320M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 170.4% difference. The GeForce GT 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 320M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
TDP
30W-92%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
65°C-19%
Perf/Watt
3.8+1167%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 320M (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 320MRadeon HD 6290
MSRP
$50
Codename
GP108
Antilles
Release
May 17 2017
March 8 2011
Ranking
#641
#583

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.