CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6290
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6290 is positioned at rank 313 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is on rank 626, so the Radeon HD 6290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6290.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 428.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+428.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6290 and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6290 scores 105 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 111 — the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi leads by 5.7%. The Radeon HD 6290 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105 | 111+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+92% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+190% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96 ×2+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+140% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+11% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6290 draws 375W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 170.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6290) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 30W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 3.7+1133% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi launched at $49 and now averages $10. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 11.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers 428.6% better value. The Radeon HD 6290 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 11.1+429% |
| Codename | Antilles | M98 |
| Release | March 8 2011 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #583 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6290 and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
