CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6290
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300 GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6290 is positioned at rank 313 and the GeForce 9300 GE is on rank 501, so the Radeon HD 6290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 GE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6290 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300 GE.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300 GE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300 GE holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 94.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+94.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6290 and GeForce 9300 GE
Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce 9300 GE
The GeForce 9300 GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6290 scores 105 and the GeForce 9300 GE reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6290 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce 9300 GE uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 GE). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 GE).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105+3% | 102 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+253% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96 ×2+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+100% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6290 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300 GE has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 6290 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300 GE) — the GeForce 9300 GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300 GE). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+33% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9300 GE).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6290 draws 375W versus the GeForce 9300 GE's 33W — a 167.6% difference. The GeForce 9300 GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6290) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 GE). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 33W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 106mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 3.1+933% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 9300 GE launched at $23 and now averages $25. The GeForce 9300 GE costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 4.1 (GeForce 9300 GE) — the GeForce 9300 GE offers 95.2% better value. The GeForce 9300 GE is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | GeForce 9300 GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $23-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $25-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 4.1+95% |
| Codename | Antilles | GM108 |
| Release | March 8 2011 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #583 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6290 and GeForce 9300 GE
