CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6290
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6290 is positioned at rank 313 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is on rank 637, so the Radeon HD 6290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6290 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6290 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6290 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 0.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6290 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Radeon HD 6290
The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6290 scores 105 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6290 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Raw compute: 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105+3% | 102 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+92% | 800 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.55 TFLOPS ×2+190% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 96 ×2+140% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+140% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6290 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 6290 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+33% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6290) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6290 draws 375W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT's 30W — a 170.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6290) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 30W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 3.4+1033% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT launched at $49 and now averages $49. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) vs 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 0% better value. The Radeon HD 6290 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6290 | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $49-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Codename | Antilles | M98 |
| Release | March 8 2011 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #583 | #818 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6290 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
