
Radeon HD 6320M vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

Radeon HD 6320M
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7600 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6320M is positioned at rank 261 and the GeForce Go 7600 GT is on rank 331, so the Radeon HD 6320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6320M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6320M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7600 GT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6320M and GeForce Go 7600 GT

Radeon HD 6320M
The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.

GeForce Go 7600 GT
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6320M scores 198 versus the GeForce Go 7600 GT's 210 — the GeForce Go 7600 GT leads by 6.1%. The Radeon HD 6320M is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce Go 7600 GT uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600 GT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 198 | 210+6% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+11% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS | 2.378 TFLOPS+24% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6320M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7600 GT has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 6320M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+24% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.4+110% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6320M) vs PureVideo (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 6320M) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7600 GT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | H.264,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6320M draws 186W versus the GeForce Go 7600 GT's 170W — a 9% difference. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 170W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 80°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















