Radeon HD 6320M vs Radeon HD 7340G

AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7340G

2013Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6320M vs Radeon HD 7340G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6320M vs Radeon HD 7340G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6320M vs Radeon HD 7340G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6320M

2011

Why buy it

  • 17.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 295.7% higher power demand at 186W vs 47W.

Radeon HD 7340G

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 47W instead of 186W, a 139W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6320M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (198 vs 196), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7340G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7340G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6320M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6320M vs Radeon HD 7340G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Radeon HD 7340G

The Radeon HD 7340G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 196 points. Launch price was $59.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6320M scores 198 and the Radeon HD 7340G reaches 196 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6320M is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 7340G uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7340G). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7340G).

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
G3D Mark Score
198+1%
196
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS+213%
0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+233%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6320M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7340G. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7340G) — the Radeon HD 6320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 11 (Radeon HD 7340G). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
DirectX
11.2+2%
11
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 6320M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7340G).

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
Encoder
None
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6320M draws 186W versus the Radeon HD 7340G's 47W — a 119.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7340G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7340G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
TDP
186W
47W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
95
75°C-21%
Perf/Watt
1.1
4.2+282%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7340G (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6320MRadeon HD 7340G
MSRP
$50
Codename
Cayman
Cape Verde
Release
December 1 2011
May 1 2013
Ranking
#598
#841

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.