Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320M

AMD

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 186W, a 141W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6320M

2011

Why buy it

  • 2.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 313.3% higher power demand at 186W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6320M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 4650 AGP instead at 208 vs 198, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4650 AGP is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4650 AGP makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6320M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 4650 AGP scores 208 versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 198 — the Radeon HD 4650 AGP leads by 5.1%. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6320M uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPRadeon HD 6320M
G3D Mark Score
208+5%
198
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480
1280+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+233%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
48 KB
320 KB+567%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPRadeon HD 6320M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650 AGP and System on the Radeon HD 6320M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320M) — the Radeon HD 6320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPRadeon HD 6320M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPRadeon HD 6320M
DirectX
10.1
11.2+11%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs None (Radeon HD 6320M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPRadeon HD 6320M
Encoder
UVD 2
None
Decoder
UVD 2
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 186W — a 122.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 193mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650 AGPRadeon HD 6320M
TDP
45W-76%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
193mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
4.6+318%
1.1