CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6320M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6320M is positioned at rank 261 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP is on rank 607, so the Radeon HD 6320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6320M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6320M.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 4650 AGP remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6320M and Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon HD 6320M
The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6320M scores 198 versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 208 — the Radeon HD 4650 AGP leads by 5.1%. The Radeon HD 6320M is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 198 | 208+5% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+167% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+233% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+567% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) — the Radeon HD 6320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+11% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6320M) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6320M draws 186W versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 45W — a 122.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6320M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 193mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320M | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 45W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 193mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 4.6+318% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6320M and Radeon HD 4650 AGP
