
Radeon HD 6550A vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

Radeon HD 6550A
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 A6-7480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6550A is positioned at rank 221 and the Radeon R5 A6-7480 is on rank 86, so the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6550A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 A6-7480
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6550A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 A6-7480.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6550A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6550A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon R5 A6-7480

Radeon HD 6550A
The Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 708 points.

Radeon R5 A6-7480
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6550A scores 708 and the Radeon R5 A6-7480 reaches 697 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6550A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6550A) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550A) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 708+2% | 697 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2304+380% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 5.834 TFLOPS+913% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 144+500% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 576 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6550A) vs 2 MB (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6550A draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6550A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6550A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Perf/Watt | 15.7+241% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6550A launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.6 (Radeon HD 6550A) vs 23.2 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon HD 6550A offers 1.7% better value. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R5 A6-7480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-14% | $35 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.6+2% | 23.2 |
| Codename | Onega | Ellesmere |
| Release | April 19 2011 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #926 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















