
Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R5 240

Radeon HD 6570
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6570 is positioned at rank 177 and the Radeon R5 240 is on rank 135, so the Radeon R5 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6570
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6570.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $79), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 692.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+692.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6570 and Radeon R5 240

Radeon HD 6570
The Radeon HD 6570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R5 240
The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6570 scores 556 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6570 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6570) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6570) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 556 | 558 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+380% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+503% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz+13% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+380% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6570 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 has 2 GB. The Radeon R5 240 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6570) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon HD 6570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6570) vs 12_0 (Radeon R5 240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6570) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 240). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6570 draws 250W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 6570) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W | 250W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 18.6+745% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6570 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $79, while the Radeon R5 240 launched at $59 and now averages $10. The Radeon R5 240 costs 87.3% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.0 (Radeon HD 6570) vs 55.8 (Radeon R5 240) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 697.1% better value. The Radeon R5 240 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $59-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $79 | $10-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 55.8+697% |
| Codename | Cayman | Oland |
| Release | December 14 2010 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #596 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















