Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R5 240

AMD

Radeon HD 6570

2010Boost: 880 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz

Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R5 240 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R5 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R5 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6570

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…84.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    33.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $79 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • ❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $20 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 34.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • βœ…Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 240 instead at 558 vs 556, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.4% (9.5 vs 7.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6570 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R5 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6570

The Radeon HD 6570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points. Launch price was $369.

AMD

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6570 scores 556 and the Radeon R5 240 reaches 558 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6570 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R5 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6570) vs 320 (Radeon R5 240). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6570) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 780 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
G3D Mark Score
556
558
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+380%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+503%
0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
880 MHz+13%
780 MHz
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
96+380%
20
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6570 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6570 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6570) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) β€” the Radeon HD 6570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6570) vs 12_0 (Radeon R5 240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12_0+7%
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6570) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 240). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
Encoder
None
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
β€”
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6570 draws 250W versus the Radeon R5 240's 30W β€” a 157.1% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 6570) vs 250W (Radeon R5 240). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
TDP
250W
30W-88%
Recommended PSU
250W
250W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
168mm
168mm
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75
β€”
Perf/Watt
2.2
18.6+745%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6570 came in at $79, while the Radeon R5 240 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon R5 240 was 25.3% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon HD 6570) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 240) β€” the Radeon R5 240 offers 35.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 240 (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 6570Radeon R5 240
MSRP
$79
$59-25%
Performance per Dollar
7.0
9.5+36%
Codename
Cayman
Oland
Release
December 14 2010
October 8 2013
Ranking
#596
#911

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.