
Radeon HD 6570

Radeon R7 M265
Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R7 M265 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R7 M265 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R7 M265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6570
2010Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Radeon R7 M265
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌64.6% HIGHER MSRP$130 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6570 vs Radeon R7 M265 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6570
The Radeon HD 6570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points. Launch price was $369.

Radeon R7 M265
The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6570 scores 556 and the Radeon R7 M265 reaches 560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6570 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 M265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 6570) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6570) vs 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265). Boost clocks: 880 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 556 | 560 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.703 TFLOPS+43% | 1.894 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 880 MHz | 925 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6570 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M265 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6570 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6570) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6570) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M265). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6570) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M265).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6570 draws 250W versus the Radeon R7 M265's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 M265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 6570) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 3.7+68% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 6570 came in at $79, while the Radeon R7 M265 launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6570 was 39.2% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon HD 6570) vs 4.3 (Radeon R7 M265) — the Radeon HD 6570 offers 62.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M265 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6570 | Radeon R7 M265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-39% | $130 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0+63% | 4.3 |
| Codename | Cayman | Pitcairn |
| Release | December 14 2010 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #596 | #489 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














