Radeon HD 6770 vs FirePro 3D V8750
Radeon HD 6770
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6770 is positioned at rank 127 and the FirePro 3D V8750 is on rank 370, so the Radeon HD 6770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6770.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6770 holds the technical lead. Priced at $129 (vs $500), it costs 74% less, resulting in a 287.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+287.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($129) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6770 and FirePro 3D V8750
Radeon HD 6770
The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.
FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6770 scores 1,271 and the FirePro 3D V8750 reaches 1,272 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6770 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro 3D V8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 6770) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,271 | 1,272 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+156% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6770 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8750 has 2 GB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 6770) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0)+11% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4+38% | 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6770) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6770 draws 108W versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 274W — a 86.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6770) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 198mm vs 254mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W-61% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 198mm | 254mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.8+157% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $129, while the FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 6770 costs 74.2% less ($371 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) vs 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) — the Radeon HD 6770 offers 296% better value. The FirePro 3D V8750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6770 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-93% | $1799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $129-74% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9+296% | 2.5 |
| Codename | Juniper | Tahiti |
| Release | January 21 2011 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #807 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6770 and FirePro 3D V8750
