Radeon HD 6770 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

AMD

Radeon HD 6770

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6770 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6770 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6770 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $44 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
  • Delivers 31.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 260% higher power demand at 108W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

  • 98.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 30W instead of 108W, a 78W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 34.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $173 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 98.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (1,300 vs 1,271), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $44 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $173, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.1% (9.9 vs 7.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 6770 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

AMD

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6770 scores 1,271 and the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,300 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6770 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 6770) vs 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score
1,271
1,300+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+56%
512
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6770 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6770 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770) vs 12 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12+7%
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6770) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Encoder
None
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 2.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6770 draws 108W versus the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 113% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6770) vs 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP
108W
30W-72%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
198mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
11.8
43.3+267%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6770 came in at $129, while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $173. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6770 was 25.4% cheaper ($44 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) vs 7.5 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon HD 6770 offers 32% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6770Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP
$129-25%
$173
Performance per Dollar
9.9+32%
7.5
Codename
Juniper
Kaveri Spectre
Release
January 21 2011
January 14 2014
Ranking
#807
#830

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.