Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

✅107.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 107.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,287 vs 1,271), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 4000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
G3D Mark Score	1,287+1%	1,271
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	336	800+138%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6384 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+113%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	448 KB+460%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 carries 1 GB. Quadro 4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6770) — the Quadro 4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 6770
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 7.7% difference. The Quadro 4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.