Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

✅82.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 286W, a 186W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $550 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4870 X2

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌186% higher power demand at 286W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 82.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 4870 X2 instead at 1,309 vs 1,287, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4870 X2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4870 X2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 4000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon HD 4870 X2

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 286W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points. Launch price was $550.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon HD 4870 X2 reaches 1,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4870 X2). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4870 X2).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 4870 X2
G3D Mark Score	1,287	1,309+2%
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	336	800 ×2+138%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6384 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS ×2+75%
ROPs	32+100%	16 ×2
TMUs	56+40%	40 ×2
L1 Cache	448 KB+180%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 4870 X2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 carries 1 GB. Quadro 4000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4870 X2. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4870 X2) — the Quadro 4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 4870 X2
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4870 X2's 286W — a 96.4% difference. The Quadro 4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 650W (Radeon HD 4870 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 4870 X2
TDP	100W-65%	286W
Recommended PSU	350W-46%	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	90°C
Perf/Watt	12.9+180%	4.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 4000M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP	—	$550
Codename	GF104	R700
Release	February 22 2011	August 12 2008
Ranking	#801	#796

Search Quadro 4000M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4870 X2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.