Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

✅4.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) instead at 1,300 vs 1,287, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 4000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,300 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score	1,287	1,300+1%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	512+52%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. Quadro 4000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	12.9	43.3+236%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP	—	$173
Codename	GF104	Kaveri Spectre
Release	February 22 2011	January 14 2014
Ranking	#801	#830

Search Quadro 4000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.