CPU
GPU
Quadro 4000M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 4000M is positioned at rank 91 and the Radeon R7 A370 is on rank 147, so the Quadro 4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A370
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 4000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A370.
| Insight | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 4000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 A370
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon R7 A370
The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,287 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1024+205% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6384 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+213% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 has 512 MB. The Quadro 4000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 A370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $51 |
| Codename | GF104 | Trinidad |
| Release | February 22 2011 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #801 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 A370
