
Quadro 4000M

Radeon R7 A370
Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 A370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 A370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 A370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon R7 A370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 A370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon R7 A370
The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,287 | 1,281 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1024+205% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6384 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+213% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 carries 512 MB. Quadro 4000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A370.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 A370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 A370 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon R7 A370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | GF104 | Trinidad |
| Release | February 22 2011 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #801 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















