Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 6770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 6770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 6770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

✅4.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 62W instead of 108W, a 46W reduction.
✅Measures 178mm instead of 198mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
364.3% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 376.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌74.2% higher power demand at 108W vs 62W.
❌11.2% longer card at 198mm vs 178mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2000 D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6770 instead at 1,271 vs 1,239, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000 D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $470 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 376.3% (9.9 vs 2.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000 D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 6770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
G3D Mark Score	1,239	1,271+3%
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+183%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 carries 1 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6770.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
DirectX	12 (11_0)+7%	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
Encoder	—	None
Decoder	NVDEC 1	UVD 2.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 54.1% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 178mm vs 198mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
TDP	62W-43%	108W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	178mm	198mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	20.0+69%	11.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 D came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6770 was 78.5% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the Radeon HD 6770 offers 371.4% better value.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Radeon HD 6770
MSRP	$599	$129-78%
Performance per Dollar	2.1	9.9+371%
Codename	GF106	Juniper
Release	October 5 2011	January 21 2011
Ranking	#892	#807

Search Quadro 2000 D on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.