
FirePro V5900

Quadro 2000 D
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌21% higher power demand at 75W vs 62W.
- ❌28.7% longer card at 229mm vs 178mm.
Quadro 2000 D
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 75W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅Measures 178mm instead of 229mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5900
The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5900 scores 1,232 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro V5900) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232 | 1,239 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS+28% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5900 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5900) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) — the FirePro V5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5900) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5900 draws 75W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 19% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5900) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 178mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 62W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 178mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.4 | 20.0+22% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5900 came in at $599, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (FirePro V5900) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 0% better value.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Codename | Cayman | GF106 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #812 | #892 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















