FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D

FirePro V5900

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V5900

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 21% higher power demand at 75W vs 62W.
  • 28.7% longer card at 229mm vs 178mm.

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 62W instead of 75W, a 13W reduction.
  • Measures 178mm instead of 229mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2000 D is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,239 vs 1,232), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V5900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000 D makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $599 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.6% (2.1 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 2000 D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V5900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V5900

The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V5900 scores 1,232 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro V5900) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score
1,232
1,239
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512+167%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6144 TFLOPS+28%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V5900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5900 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5900) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) — the FirePro V5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5900) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
DirectX
11.2
12 (11_0)+7%
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
Encoder
None
Decoder
UVD 3.1
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V5900 draws 75W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 19% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5900) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 178mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
TDP
75W
62W-17%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
178mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
16.4
20.0+22%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V5900 came in at $599, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (FirePro V5900) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 0% better value.

FeatureFirePro V5900Quadro 2000 D
MSRP
$599
$599
Performance per Dollar
2.1
2.1
Codename
Cayman
GF106
Release
May 24 2011
October 5 2011
Ranking
#812
#892

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.