FirePro V5900 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5900 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5900 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5900
2011Why buy it
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β71.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $249 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β Delivers 69.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012β2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5900 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5900
The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,217 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5900 scores 1,232 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U reaches 1,217 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro V5900) vs 1,024 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232+1% | 1,217 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+225% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U carries 512 MB. FirePro V5900 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5900 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5900 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U's 100W β a 28.6% difference. The FirePro V5900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5900) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 229mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 16.4+34% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5900 came in at $599, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U was 41.6% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (FirePro V5900) vs 3.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) β the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U offers 66.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $350-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 3.5+67% |
| Codename | Cayman | Trinidad |
| Release | May 24 2011 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #812 | #467 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















