Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro V5900 vs Radeon HD 6770

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro V5900

2011Core: 600 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6770

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro V5900 vs Radeon HD 6770 Performance Spectrum

FirePro V5900
2 GB 75
1,232
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6630M
brand logoRadeon R7 M365X
brand logoRadeon R7 340
brand logoRadeon R7 430
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon HD 6770
1 GB 108
1,271
+3.2%
brand logoRadeon HD 6550A
brand logoRadeon R7 A8-7670K
brand logoRadeon HD 8690M
brand logoRadeon R9 M275
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V5900 vs Radeon HD 6770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V5900

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 108W, a 33W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    364.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ❌15.7% longer card at 229mm vs 198mm.

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 379% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 198mm instead of 229mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌44% higher power demand at 108W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6770 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (1,271 vs 1,232), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V5900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $470 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 379% (9.9 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V5900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V5900 vs Radeon HD 6770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V5900

The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V5900 scores 1,232 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro V5900) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770).

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
G3D Mark Score
1,232
1,271+3%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6144 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+121%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V5900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 carries 1 GB. FirePro V5900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5900 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5900) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6770) — the FirePro V5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5900) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
DirectX
11.2
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5900) vs None (Radeon HD 6770). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 3.1
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V5900 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 36.1% difference. The FirePro V5900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5900) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 198mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
TDP
75W-31%
108W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
198mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80
75-6%
Perf/Watt
16.4+39%
11.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V5900 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6770 was 78.5% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (FirePro V5900) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the Radeon HD 6770 offers 371.4% better value.

FeatureFirePro V5900Radeon HD 6770
MSRP
$599
$129-78%
Performance per Dollar
2.1
9.9+371%
Codename
Cayman
Juniper
Release
May 24 2011
January 21 2011
Ranking
#812
#807
Search FirePro V5900 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 6770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.