
FirePro V5900

HD Graphics P630
FirePro V5900 vs HD Graphics P630 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V5900 vs HD Graphics P630 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V5900 vs HD Graphics P630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V5900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V5900 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
HD Graphics P630
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V5900 vs HD Graphics P630 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V5900
The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

HD Graphics P630
The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5900 scores 1,232 and the HD Graphics P630 reaches 1,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the HD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 512 (FirePro V5900) vs 192 (HD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900) vs 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,232 | 1,280+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6144 TFLOPS+45% | 0.4224 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5900 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics P630 carries 0 MB. FirePro V5900 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V5900 and System on the HD Graphics P630.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V5900) vs 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P630). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5900) vs Quick Sync Video (HD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900) vs H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (HD Graphics P630).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5900 draws 75W versus the HD Graphics P630's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5900) vs 1W (HD Graphics P630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.4 | 85.3+420% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V5900 came in at $599, while the HD Graphics P630 launched at $0. On MSRP, HD Graphics P630 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (FirePro V5900) vs Infinity (HD Graphics P630) — the HD Graphics P630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics P630 (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V5900 | HD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Cayman | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | August 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #812 | #822 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















