G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 2000 D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760A

2014

Why buy it

✅37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 138% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
140.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000 D instead at 1,239 vs 1,226, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $350 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 138% (4.9 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score	1,226	1,239+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768+300%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.009 TFLOPS+110%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	64 KB	256 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 2000 D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 760A and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	—
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 12% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
TDP	55W-11%	62W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	178mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	22.3+12%	20.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760A came in at $249, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760A was 58.4% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the GeForce GTX 760A offers 133.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760A (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760A	Quadro 2000 D
MSRP	$249-58%	$599
Performance per Dollar	4.9+133%	2.1
Codename	GK106	GF106
Release	March 17 2014	October 5 2011
Ranking	#813	#892

Search GeForce GTX 760A on Amazon

Search Quadro 2000 D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.