GeForce GTX 760A
VS
Quadro 2000 D

GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 2000 D

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 760A is positioned at rank 483 and the Quadro 2000 D is on rank 288, so the Quadro 2000 D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A

#473
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2207%
#475
2000%
#476
1995%
#480
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1814%
#481
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1802%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
100%
#484
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#485
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
98%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
97%
#487
97%
#488
97%
#489
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
97%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#491
96%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
#493
96%
#494
95%
#495
92%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D

#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
100%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
97%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
96%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
95%
#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
94%
#272
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7137%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#289
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
100%
#290
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
98%
#293
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
96%
#294
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
95%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
95%
#298
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
94%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
94%
#301
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
92%
#302
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.

InsightGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 15.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+15.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 2000 D

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score
1,226
1,239+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768+300%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.009 TFLOPS+110%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
64 KB
256 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 12% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
TDP
55W-11%
62W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
178mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
22.3+12%
20.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro 2000 D costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 15.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 760A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760AQuadro 2000 D
MSRP
$249-58%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$35-13%
Performance per Dollar
30.6
35.4+16%
Codename
GK106
GF106
Release
March 17 2014
October 5 2011
Ranking
#813
#892