
GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 2000 D

GeForce GTX 760A
Popular choices:

Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 760A is positioned at rank 483 and the Quadro 2000 D is on rank 288, so the Quadro 2000 D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $40), it costs 13% less, resulting in a 15.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 2000 D

GeForce GTX 760A
The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760A scores 1,226 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760A is built on Kepler while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,226 | 1,239+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+300% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS+110% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 256 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760A comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760A draws 55W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 12% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-11% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 178mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 22.3+12% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro 2000 D costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) vs 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 15.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 760A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $35-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.6 | 35.4+16% |
| Codename | GK106 | GF106 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #813 | #892 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












